Book Section
Marianna Poyares
Theory’s Method?
Ethnography and Critical Theory
This chapter addresses the use of ethnographic methods in critical social theory, and the assumption that such methods prove to be useful because they allow the researcher to be closer to ‘matter itself’. Instead, I argue for ethnography from within a framework of historical materialism and social critique, marking the difference between such ‘materialism without matter’, based on Marx’s ‘fetishism of the commodity’, and some strategies of New Materialism. My goal is to situate the uses of ethnography for a transformed consideration of the relation between theory and practice.
Title |
Theory’s Method?
|
Subtitle |
Ethnography and Critical Theory
|
Author(s) |
Marianna Poyares
|
Identifier | |
Description |
This chapter addresses the use of ethnographic methods in critical social theory, and the assumption that such methods prove to be useful because they allow the researcher to be closer to ‘matter itself’. Instead, I argue for ethnography from within a framework of historical materialism and social critique, marking the difference between such ‘materialism without matter’, based on Marx’s ‘fetishism of the commodity’, and some strategies of New Materialism. My goal is to situate the uses of ethnography for a transformed consideration of the relation between theory and practice.
|
Is Part Of | |
Place |
Berlin
|
Publisher |
ICI Berlin Press
|
Date |
March 2, 2021
|
Subject |
ethnography
historical materialism
critical theory
new materialism
|
Rights |
© by the author(s)
Except for images or otherwise noted, this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
|
Harvested |
yes
|
Language |
en-GB
|
short title |
Theory’s Method
|
page start |
345
|
page end |
363
|
Source |
Materialism and Politics, ed. by Bernardo Bianchi, Emilie Filion-Donato, Marlon Miguel, and Ayşe Yuva, Cultural Inquiry, 20 (Berlin: ICI Berlin Press, 2021), pp. 345–63
|